Jun. 8th, 2018 12:53 pm
(no subject)
Here:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6393/1116
some folks from UPenn are writing about themfinding perpetuum mobile critical point for implementing the Hope and the Change.
I am somewhat sceptical about that since I saw no discussion about the risks and limitation of the model offered in their study. However, I'd like to know what you think about it since Obama's "scientists".... did not fire well with their Hope and Change model.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6393/1116
some folks from UPenn are writing about them
I am somewhat sceptical about that since I saw no discussion about the risks and limitation of the model offered in their study. However, I'd like to know what you think about it since Obama's "scientists".... did not fire well with their Hope and Change model.
Tags:
This is neither new nor controversial
Re: This is neither new nor controversial
The other interesting observation lays in time average. By looking at the past events we get that the revolution is eating its own om some sort of period T. Now, I have not see such strong convergence. I'd like to look at it and sort out cases (or rather case groups by the same property) but folks are silent on that as well. I wonder, why.